Testing the QN8007B for spectral and baseband purity
1. Spectrum

8 MHz Span. A fair amount of phase noise is present, but better than -50dBc, so performance is excellent
for this type of device and its intended use. PLL reference sideband spurs can also be seen at ±400kHz which are -49.21dBc.

Spectrum between Fc and the first harmonic (encompassing the ‘Air band’ frequencies) is clean. With a
suitable RF filter, all harmonics can easily be attenuated to better than -70dBc.

Looks scary, but isn't. Just for interest, these are the harmonics from the entire circuit
1.
Harmonic levels were entirely acceptable for this type of device and its intended use. Also, with a suitable harmonics filter,
all harmonics could easily be attenuated to better than -70dBc (entirely unnecessary for nanoWatt broadcasting).
2. Baseband

Baseband spectrum with no audio content present. A number of in-band spurs can be seen. The first prominent signal is the 19kHz
pilot. The second is the 38kHz carrier for the stereo difference signal, which should be nulled as much as possible. Because
the pilot’s first harmonic is also on this frequency, it’s often impossible to null completely, and the level seen is very
acceptable for this type of device and its intended use. The third prominent signal (the ‘bunny ears’) is the RDS carrier. Phase
noise can be seen, and there’s a notable spur at around Fc+98kHz
2

Baseband with modulation (audio content) and RDS. Note the very impressive sharp 15KHz audio filtering; similar in performance
to today’s professional digital audio processors. This ensures treble content reaches right up to the permitted maximum 15KHz,
whilst protecting the Pilot Tone and subcarriers.

This is possibly the most impressive part of the QN8007B. The internal soft-clipping limiter does an excellent job of keeping
deviation precisely to ±75kHz without overshoots. The above shows the device using default settings. The maximum deviation
level can be precisely ‘trimmed’ in firmware.
When exceeding the specified maximum audio input level, clipping distortion floods the Pilot Tone and RDS subcarriers with
intermodulation hash. As to be expected, this results in (1) spectral occupancy exceeding the intended FM channel (2)
corruption of transmitted RDS data bits, causing RDS reception errors. It must be pointed out that this only to be expected
and is no fault of the QN8007B; it would happen in all high-end FM broadcast modulator and processor systems under the same
conditions.
To protect the QN8007B’s excellent audio performance at excessive input levels, an additional external AGC and limiter circuit
(with peak clipping) could be added, ahead of the device’s audio inputs.

The default Pilot Tone and RDS injection levels are perfect 'out-of-the-box', and would comply with UK regulatory levels. Due to
the ‘transparent’ way in which the QN8007 handles RDS groups and content sent from the host MCU, extended RDS features can
be broadcast, like PI Codes, TP and AF data, plus RadioTEXT (for dynamic “Now playing…” updates).
3. Conclusion
On a properly constructed PCB and programmed correctly, the QN8007 exhibits truly amazing performance relative to other such
devices. Audio quality is excellent. Audio test tone sweeps indicate that the audio performance is flat from 20Hz to 15kHz
(taking the pre-emphasis curve into account, which is also very accurately implemented). Bass audio performance down to 20Hz
is a sign of a nicely implemented PLL design, which allows bass content to shift the carrier frequency, without attempts to
frequency-correct it (which would result is weak, distorted bass). This is usually achieved by using a wide bandwidth loop
filter which, in turn, can affect the PLL's lock speed. However, the PLL locks very quickly indeed. As mentioned earlier, the treble
content is also preserved, right up to the maximum permitted 15kHz, with impressive steep cut-off evident (suggesting digital
FIR filter performance).
The device is perfect for its intended purpose and could be made entirely compliant with nanoWatt broadcasting regulations,
plus CE / FCC product certification requirements. A professional manufacturer will easily be able to realise a commercial
product for micropower FM audio applications (like in-car MP3 player or Digital Radio player adaptors) using the QN8007B.
This is the intended application for which it was designed, and for which it will perform incredibly well. This modern device
will certainly provide an improvement in spectral purity, audio quality, and features, over similar devices historically
offered for this purpose.
Because these results are likely to be of interest to hobby broadcasters - and possibly even transmitter manufacturers -
speculating as to whether the QN8007B could be used as part of a higher power broadcast transmitter, the following additional
information is provided as a guide.
The QN8007B is significantly better than devices like the BA1404 - historically popular with hobbyists - in terms of spectral
purity, performance and quality. It also adds RDS functionality.
Hypothetically, due to its incredibly good performance, flexibility in programming, and full RDS capabilities, a full
broadcast service could be implemented. In fact, at RF outputs up to 1 Watt, it could
almost be compliant with broadcast
regulations. For example, taking stringent UK regulations, as an example
3 :
Spectral Occupancy, Spurious Emissions and Harmonics for transmitters with output greater than 250 mW, and less than 25 W:
Limit = 25 µW. Which at 1 Watt (0dBW) = -46.02 dBc relative to a 1W carrier. (Air Band 108 – 137 MHz: Limit = [46 + ERP in dBW]
dB below unmodulated carrier power. Which at 1W (0dBW) = -46.00 dBc).
| Test |
Specification Limit |
Result of 50mW test circuit |
| Frequency |
+/- 2kHz |
98000197Hz |
PASS |
| Pilot Level |
6.75kHz (+/- 0.75kHz) |
6.69kHz |
PASS |
| RDS Level |
Nominal 2kHz |
2.02kHz |
PASS |
| Peak Deviation Level |
75kHz maximum |
75kHz |
PASS |
| Spectral Occupancy |
<-46.02dB at +/-150kHz |
49.00dBc |
PASS |
| Worst In-band Spurious |
<-46.02dBc |
49.21dBc |
PASS |
| Worst Air-band Spurious |
<-40.00dBc |
Better than -70dBc |
PASS |
| Worst Harmonic |
<-46.02dBc |
Not tested |
See Notes |
But NOT at powers above 1 Watt.
…And, regrettably, NOT in reality.
...All commercial broadcast transmitters must not only meet these site performance
specifications imposed by broadcast regulators; they must also meet CE / FCC overall product standards, if they are to be
used in Europe or America. Use of a QN8007B would NOT result in a transmitter (designed to radiate more than 0.01 microwatts)
meeting these requirements. The phase noise, alone, is too high. This means that they cannot be lawfully imported or sold
within these territories, despite often being seen for sale on internet marketplace sellers, incorrectly badged as compliant
4.
4. Test Set-up
A PCB was made, using good RF layout discipline, on a double-sided PTH circuit board. A buffer circuit was added, and wideband
RF coupling transformer output in order to make accurate measurements. It’s entirely possible that a buffer circuit could affect
harmonic levels
1 but there was little change when testing the QN8007’s own output, unbuffered (±1 to 2dB over the
entire range of harmonics). In any case, harmonics were ignored during these tests, for the most part, as they can be easily
filtered by implementing additional RF circuitry.
Components used were the datasheet recommended values. A crystal oscillator was used to drive the QN8007B’s XCLK input, rather than
implementing a passive crystal. The external oscillator was considered best for achieving optimum RF spectrum performance. Indeed,
both arrangements were tested and proved comparable. A high-Q loading coil was used. Additional experiments were performed using
various AC and DC coupling of the crystal oscillator output, plus various resistive padding, without any improvements noted.
Similarly, the following experiments were also performed (whilst monitoring the RF purity generated by the QN8007B) :
| Change power supply decoupling components and their values |
No discernible change |
| Disconnect MCU power (after boot data transfer) to remove possible RF spurs resulting from digital circuit noise, particularly
from the continuous RDS data present on I2C lines |
No discernible change |
| Optimise inductor value for efficient matching |
No discernible change |
| Change 15pF series RF output coupling capacitor value |
No discernible change |
With optimal matching of the loading coil, the RF output power of the circuit was accurately measured to be 50mW.
Equipment used
Circuit schematic
Photo of test PCB
5. Notes
1 The circuit includes a buffer transistor. Additional RF amplification stages can often change harmonic levels, maybe increasing
or decreasing harmonics, or even introducing harmonics across a wider range, compared to a previous RF circuit stage. However,
levels were similar when disconnecting the buffer circuit completely and connecting the Analyser to the QN8007B output directly.
2 Most of the evident in-band spurious content would be below the noise floor on the signal received by most FM receivers, meaning
RF performance is, comparatively, and in reality, quite impressive.
3 This is a simplified interpretation of some of the site testing requirements published in Ofcom’s ‘Analogue Radio Technical Code’
in the UK. Additional requirements exist.
4 As a starting point, see ETSI EN 302 018 document as a (non-exhaustive) example of test criteria applied to FM transmission
equipment products placed on the market, outputting powers greater than nanoWatts.
E&OE.